<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Broadway Tower Photographed in Infrared</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/landscape/broadway-tower-photographed-in-infrared/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/landscape/broadway-tower-photographed-in-infrared/</link>
	<description>David James Williams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:29:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/landscape/broadway-tower-photographed-in-infrared/comment-page-1/#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/?p=643#comment-988</guid>
		<description>OK the 2 main ways to take infrared photography are with an&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/photography-tutorials/infrared-tutorial/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; IR filter&lt;/a&gt; you place on the lens.  
 Although cheapest way , it does have down sides in terms of exposure times etc.   This photo however was taken with a &lt;a href=&quot;http://lifepixel.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;converted DSLR to IR&lt;/a&gt;, where they replace the filter over the sensor of your camera with one that only lets through IR.   Here you shoot as normal :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK the 2 main ways to take infrared photography are with an<a href="http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/photography-tutorials/infrared-tutorial/" rel="nofollow"> IR filter</a> you place on the lens.<br />
 Although cheapest way , it does have down sides in terms of exposure times etc.   This photo however was taken with a <a href="http://lifepixel.com/" rel="nofollow">converted DSLR to IR</a>, where they replace the filter over the sensor of your camera with one that only lets through IR.   Here you shoot as normal <img src='http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nitin satghare</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/landscape/broadway-tower-photographed-in-infrared/comment-page-1/#comment-987</link>
		<dc:creator>nitin satghare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 20:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/?p=643#comment-987</guid>
		<description>what it is infrared converter? how much exposure compans it takes? please tale me in briff.thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what it is infrared converter? how much exposure compans it takes? please tale me in briff.thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/landscape/broadway-tower-photographed-in-infrared/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 21:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/?p=643#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Stunning!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stunning!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

