<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon 70-300mm example photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/photography-chat/nikon-70-300mm-example-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/photography-chat/nikon-70-300mm-example-photos/</link>
	<description>David James Williams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:29:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/photography-chat/nikon-70-300mm-example-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/?p=691#comment-247</guid>
		<description>With the 70-300 VR I used the Nikon D200 (replacement is D300).  These are semi pro bodies &amp; as such the focusing speed is very quick plus acurate.  I couldn&#039;t say how the D90 performs with sports.

The only analogy I can give is when I moved to Canon, I had a couple of 40D&#039;s.  After trying to use them at an equestrian event, I realised they were not up to the focus speed / acuracy of the D200.  I ended up buying a Canon 1D MKII, which was a huge improvement on the 40D.

Hope that is of some help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the 70-300 VR I used the Nikon D200 (replacement is D300).  These are semi pro bodies &#038; as such the focusing speed is very quick plus acurate.  I couldn&#8217;t say how the D90 performs with sports.</p>
<p>The only analogy I can give is when I moved to Canon, I had a couple of 40D&#8217;s.  After trying to use them at an equestrian event, I realised they were not up to the focus speed / acuracy of the D200.  I ended up buying a Canon 1D MKII, which was a huge improvement on the 40D.</p>
<p>Hope that is of some help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PDH Zijlstra</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/photography-chat/nikon-70-300mm-example-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>PDH Zijlstra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/?p=691#comment-246</guid>
		<description>What camera do you use with the Nikkor 16-85?
I would like to have the Nikon D90, but maybe this camera is to slow to take sportshots
now and then.

At the moment I have a Canon Rebel 350D (17-85 is usm &amp; 70-300 is usm) equipment and are ready to make the move to Nikon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What camera do you use with the Nikkor 16-85?<br />
I would like to have the Nikon D90, but maybe this camera is to slow to take sportshots<br />
now and then.</p>
<p>At the moment I have a Canon Rebel 350D (17-85 is usm &amp; 70-300 is usm) equipment and are ready to make the move to Nikon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

