<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gloucestershire Portrait Photographer &#8211; Couples Portraits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/portrait-photography/gloucestershire-portrait-photographer-couples-portraits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/portrait-photography/gloucestershire-portrait-photographer-couples-portraits/</link>
	<description>David James Williams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 06:46:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/portrait-photography/gloucestershire-portrait-photographer-couples-portraits/comment-page-1/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 10:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/?p=941#comment-672</guid>
		<description>Thanks, agree fully with you there</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, agree fully with you there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: photoman022</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/portrait-photography/gloucestershire-portrait-photographer-couples-portraits/comment-page-1/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>photoman022</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/?p=941#comment-669</guid>
		<description>I like number 2 better.  Number 1 looks like there is some sort of tension between them, maybe they are still in the midst of an argument.  Number 2 looks better because of the look on her face (kind of an &quot;I hooked him and now it&#039;s time to reel him in&quot; look).  With the man being slightly out of focus, with the slight smile on his lips, he looks like he&#039;s thinking &quot;I&#039;m glad I&#039;m hooked.&quot;  Also, in #1, his eyes are on the camera.  In #2, they are on her.  The tone (kind of like a sepia tone) adds to the mood of the second photo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like number 2 better.  Number 1 looks like there is some sort of tension between them, maybe they are still in the midst of an argument.  Number 2 looks better because of the look on her face (kind of an &#8220;I hooked him and now it&#8217;s time to reel him in&#8221; look).  With the man being slightly out of focus, with the slight smile on his lips, he looks like he&#8217;s thinking &#8220;I&#8217;m glad I&#8217;m hooked.&#8221;  Also, in #1, his eyes are on the camera.  In #2, they are on her.  The tone (kind of like a sepia tone) adds to the mood of the second photo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave J Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/portrait-photography/gloucestershire-portrait-photographer-couples-portraits/comment-page-1/#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave J Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/?p=941#comment-567</guid>
		<description>Thanks Simon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Simon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/portrait-photography/gloucestershire-portrait-photographer-couples-portraits/comment-page-1/#comment-471</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 06:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjameswilliams.com/?p=941#comment-471</guid>
		<description>The second ... but not because of the processing - more the expressions ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second &#8230; but not because of the processing &#8211; more the expressions &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
